PGY1 Pharmacy Residency · Public demo scorecard (frozen snapshot)
Candidate 2 — Solid generalist
Well-rounded rotations and dependable references, but thin scholarship and a mid GPA — strong with visible tradeoffs.
3.60
composite (1–5)
Rank #2 of 3
Blinding: ONEligibility pre-screen: passNo protected-attribute references
Scored dimensions
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
Clinical / rotation (APPE) experience 5 APPE rotation(s) across 5 setting(s), including a specialized/acute site. Evidence “Internal Medicine APPE (community teaching hospital)” — canonical/clinical_appe_experience | 4 | 20 | 0.80 |
Work / practice experience 2 pharmacy work role(s) at a consistent practice level. Evidence “Pharmacy Intern — Dispensing and patient counseling” — canonical/work_practice_experience | 4 | 10 | 0.40 |
Leadership & professional involvement 1 elected/appointed leadership role(s) with measurable impact. Evidence “Secretary — Student Society of Health-System Pharmacists” — canonical/leadership_professional_involvement | 4 | 15 | 0.60 |
Research & scholarship (presentations / publications) 0 publication(s) and 0 presentation(s) across 1 scholarly item(s). Evidence “Medication reconciliation QI project (Riverside State University)” — canonical/research_scholarship | 2 | 15 | 0.30 |
Letters of recommendation (standardized references) Mean standardized rating 3.9/5, narratives cite concrete examples. Evidence “Internal medicine clinical pharmacist (preceptor): "Recommend with enthusiasm"” — canonical/letters_of_recommendation | 4 | 20 | 0.80 |
Letter of intent / program fit Letter is specific and program-aligned (655 chars, 2 program-specific term(s)). Evidence “letter_of_intent (655 chars)” — canonical/letter_of_intent_program_fit | 4 | 10 | 0.40 |
Academic performance Cumulative GPA 3.34 maps to the academic-performance anchors. Evidence “transcript.gpa = 3.34” — canonical/academic_performance | 3 | 10 | 0.30 |
| Composite (weighted, 1–5) | 100 | 3.60 |
Advisory — Decision support only. This engine produces analytical work product to assist a human reviewer — anchored scores, justifications, and evidence pointers. It augments the review; it never auto-rejects an applicant. The residency committee owns the rank list and the final decision.
Run provenance (audit-run record)
- rubric
- v1.0.0 · sha256:4990c28b70f4beccf0ef20efd70ec986da8ccf3142365e57aa3b682676f0e530
- model
- mock · mock:deterministic-v1
- input_hash
- sha256:f15805e41ec1e680a1afc3c22d5e0e969bb563bc840189d31b21fb08f5847d50
- scored_at
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z